Jay Graydon with Sherwood Ball | Crank Sinatra

Go To Artist Page

Recommended if You Like
Frank Sinatra Freddie Green Jay Graydon

Album Links
JaR - Jay Graydon and Randy Goodrum Jay Graydon Official Web Site Jay Graydon at jaygraydon.net Jay Graydon Official MySpace

More Artists From
United States - California - LA

Other Genres You Will Love
Jazz: Jazz-Pop Easy Listening: Crooners/Vocals Moods: Featuring Guitar
Sell your music everywhere
There are no items in your wishlist.

Crank Sinatra

by Jay Graydon with Sherwood Ball

A modern arrangement of a Frank Sinatra song with all the brass, sax and horn parts played by Jay Graydon on guitars, with the amazing Sherwood Ball on lead vocals.
Genre: Jazz: Jazz-Pop
Release Date: 

We'll ship when it's back in stock

Order now and we'll ship when it's back in stock, or enter your email below to be notified when it's back in stock.
Sign up for the CD Baby Newsletter
Your email address will not be sold for any reason.
Continue Shopping
available for download only
Share to Google +1

To listen to tracks you will need to update your browser to a recent version.

  Song Share Time Download
1. Day In - Day Out
Jay Graydon
2:29 $0.99
Downloads are available as MP3-320 files.


Album Notes
Crank Sinatra - The Concept

So around the middle of 2008, I happened to watch a Frank Sinatra TV special filmed in the mid 1960’s. The opening song is Day In – Day Out. As always, Frank sang great and the Nelson Riddle arrangement was perfect for the era! What a great team they were!

I dug the musicality so much I watched over and over and then began thinking what it would sound like to play the horn parts on guitar playing one part at a time as an experiment. With that in mind, I decided to take on the task of being a one-man band. The experiment turned out to be much fun and the result is a sound of guitars I had not heard before.

The above is the short version. Now for complete details (if you give a shit. ).

The Arrangement
Step one was to kind of transcribe the arrangement, keeping in mind the horn parts need to be at least kind of friendly when played on guitar.

As to writing out the arrangement, keep in mind the audio I was listening to, originated from a TV show in the early 60’s. Ironically, the audio was in stereo (mono TV in that era) but not a wide stereo as so much mic leakage. It was difficult to hear some of the horn parts so the “Amazing Slow Downer” was the prefect tool as always as to figure out lines and voicings.

As to the piano, bass, and rhythm guitar parts, I just used the basic chord structures and modified in a big way.

The Track
The next move was to record the basic track for the Piano, Bass, and Drums. Since just an experiment at the time, I played all parts into a sequencer using sample programs friendly to the sound of the concept. The track (Piano, Bass and Drums) is kind of stiff since again, an experiment but I did my best to offset the swing factor past a standard Triplet time by hand. (Using 960 ticks per beat, the triplet tilt is typically 640 and I extended to 664 ticks as the average for more of a swing tilt,)

Guitar Sounds - Freddie Green Style
Yea, the arrangement wants that sound! I love playing 4’s rhythm in the classical big band style. My 1932 Gibson L5 was perfect for the application!!! The tone of this guitar is outstanding!!! Man, too much fun playing that part — chunking 4’s playing little 3 note chords is like a kid in a candy store!!!

The Brass Parts Guitar Sound
During the early stages of the process, I thought about the approach as to emulating horn sounds on guitar. As we know, forte brass has a very bright spike on the front of the note and then sustains into a bright tone.

I asked my pals Dean Parks and David Hungate what they might do as to emulate. Dean mentioned using a Mutron type filter so I performed some experiments and realized the Mutron type filter for the brass sound was too much like an effect.

Dean also mentioned using a volume pedal for the Forte/piano/forte (attack leading to a quick fade in volume and then the volume rises as a typical horn part that would be written for that effect. I had thought of the same but since Dean mentioned as well, a good starting place for that concept.

A experiment was performed and the guitar level to the amp on the volume pull down back to full volume caused the guitar amp to loose it’s buzzing sustain. (Opps, getting ahead of how the final sound came about.) I decided to do the forte/piano/forte after playing the parts riding levels in Pro Tools.

OK, the next move was to simply use a sweet distorted guitar sound that has “bite” at attack. Well, a distorted sound is saturated at attack so no ‘Snap” to the attack. The next idea was to use two amps — one with a clean sound for the attack and one with a sweet distorted sound blended evenly.

I bought an active guitar signal splitter with two outputs. (Note an active signal splitter is needed versus using a “Y” cord to split off the signal as the “Y” cord routing would drop the signal -6 dB along with other problems such as a ground problem.)

So one amp was set to a total clean sound with major “Bite” and the other was set to a sweet distortion sound.

Let’s regress for a moment as the guitar of choice for the Brass needed a rear pickup that is bright but extremely musical allowing some sweet mids. My Eddie Van Halen Music Man was my first choice and ended up being the guitar used. The rear pickup on this guitar is outstanding that allows a sweet mid range tone along with a nice bright centered tone. The guitar rear pickup has great definition in distortion land, (Note that guitar is no longer manufactured but there is another Music Man guitar with a very similar pickup).

Ok, that problem solved so I recorded the parts.

The Sax Parts Guitar Sound
I asked Dudley Gimple (Music Man guitar designer) for advice and he stated he had an old Maestro effect that was used to emulate a sax sound. I knew of the unit from my Don Ellis days (the sax players used the effect when playing through amps on a few songs). I remembered the effect though the tone was not what I needed. After serious thought, all I could come up with was to use an arch top jazz guitar. I used my early 80’s George Benson small body. A great defined jazz tone. Yea, not a sax family sound but it worked as totally different from the brass sound.

The Horn Parts Layout
As to the brass, I play 4 trumpet parts and 4 trombone parts. As to the saxes, I played 4 sax parts. I would have included a 5th baritone part of the sound I used was more transparent.

The Vocal
I was going to sing the song myself but I wanted an aggressive vocal as to match with the aggressive guitars. I asked Sherwood Ball if he would like to sing the song and he was into doing the gig! Sherwood did a great job as always!!!

The Project Name
So why Crank Sinatra? Well, in guitar land, I cranked up the guitar amp volume for the brass sound hence Crank Sinatra.

The Rap Up
I had so much fun recording the stuff!!! I hope you enjoy the experiment.

Jay Graydon



to write a review

Morten Teinum

This song in flac/wav 44.1kHz/16bit would be highly appreciated

Donnie Lee

Why Do Great Performers Try This?!
Three starts only for the exceptional musicianship. The singer's voice is fine, but trying to imitate Sinatra's is a dead-end street. I highly suspect that this cat has his own style, to which I would much rather listen. I wonder if he has yet discovered that style? I only gave this a listen because Jay was on the record. Many people do not know Jay is a well trained Jazz Man. But, alas, he is best known for a single fluke lead on Steely's Dan's "Peg". That was fine work all-'round, but Jay is FAR more than that. Frankly, I think he was simply in the right mood, felt good, and thus the unusual and satisfying lead. Jay can play real Jazz, REAL well. I love listening to his rhythm comp work more than his lead work (which is still great!). I guess guitar leads are generally not my thing, unless they take no more than one chorus. Hmmm, Charlie Christian still absorbs me...Eddie Lang, Karl Kress, Lonnie Johnson, etc. as well. So I am not really sure, except that the pocket is where I live best. I like modern pop work. Amos Garret on "Midnight At The Oasis" still bombs me out. I am meandering. Bottom line: Rhythm and the pocket are where the cake is at. Lead is something that a good rhythm man should investigate when he mature. Like Jay.
Jay is a true pro. From my experience, sidemen are always the better musicians.
However; to possess a natural instrument like Sinatra and to have become so good at his game is highly unusual. E.g., if Capitol had not rescued Sinatra from the dreary, boring, dull, predictable and redundant Axel Atordahl, poor Frank Sinatra's career would have ended in 1951. By 1960, he'd have been lucky to do openers in Vegas. I can hear people, saying "NOT 'Frank'! Frank is g-d!" No, las, he was just a great and lucky performer, and it is still show business. put the ars--- in the seats, sell the publishing attract the young girls, etc. People must learn to enjoy this stuff with some sort of grain of salt and more education. A Sinatra tribute works best when the artists perform the tunes as THEMSELVES. I.e. It is best to NOT listen to Sinatra a few month before writing your lead sheets and going into the studio. If a singer sounds like a Sinatra imitator...oh dear, I am so sorry for them, as they will likely never break out to be their own man.
Mr. Graydon is better than this.
No sweat+, work is work, and i would personally enjoyed playing on tis record. The singer is one of the better Sinatra shadows i have heard and the reast of the band are professional sidemen. I was not robbed, it's just not a CD I will be listening to much nor does it make my permanent iPod base (I have the largest, 160 gig classic, so I am limitted to about half my collection) —Paix